Mark has written to
BT protesting at the proposed closure of some public
payphones in South Derbyshire.
BT is consulting on its plans to remove 18 public payphones within
the district as part of a nationwide programme of closures.
The company
says that 60 per cent of its payphones nationally are unprofitable
and usage has halved in the past two
years.
Mark is objecting particularly to
the plans for four of these phones - near Melbourne Leisure
Centre, next to John Port School in Etwall, at the Post Office in
Hatton and at Goseley Avenue, Hartshorne.
All these locations have large number of
users,
as many as 2,200 users a year. He also thinks the company should
retain the Coton-in-the-Elms phone - which is near a mobile home
site.
He said: "I'd argue that the loss of any payphone with usage at
these levels would be a severe inconvenience. There are a small
number with very small usage (less than 50 callers
a year) where it would be hard to argue for
retention.
"Of those in the middle range, one at Coton-in-the-Elms is next to
a mobile home park where landline access may be harder. I'd suggest
that any phone boxes
above two callers a
week
is retained unless there is clear evidence of a convenient
alternative."
| David Bellaby - Message left at 10:03 am, Mon 28th Jul 2008 |
I was surprised about the plans for the removal of the one 'high street' phone box in Melbourne. I suppose the usage has been checked and will have fallen -as many now have mobiles- but its loss will
still affect people (possibly in an emergency) I wonder what the parish council feel about this |
| Peter Bayley-Bligh - Message left at 09:58 am, Mon 28th Jul 2008 |
I have not used one for a long time but neither do I 'like' mobiles. You mention use of 2000 calls per year in certain areas and to include Coton Mobile Park. I would agree with you that these should
stay. |
| Peter Bayley-Bligh - Message left at 09:58 am, Mon 28th Jul 2008 |
I have not used one for a long time but neither do I 'like' mobiles. You mention use of 2000 calls per year in certain areas and to include Coton Mobile Park. I would agree with you that these should
stay. |
| Kathryn May - Message left at 09:48 am, Mon 28th Jul 2008 |
I am quite concerned about safeguarding the public call boxes in the area. Not everyone has a mobile / household phone and, in the event of accidents, they are a vital contact to the emergency
services as well as an important conduit by which families are able to keep in touch with each other. Hatton has a sizeable percentage of vulnerable residents living on fixed incomes who will feel
disempowered by the removal of this amenity and I am glad that you are prepared to make a stand against its proposed removal. |
|